English Language Feeds

ACE to Honor Cal State Fullerton President Mildred García With 2017 Reginald Wilson Diversity Leadership Award

American Council on Education - 10 hours 1 min ago
García, president of California State University, Fullerton, will be presented with the award during the closing plenary of ACE2017, ACE's 99th Annual Meeting, on March 14 in Washington, DC.

Why one academic spends hours a week putting together a spreadsheet of documented harassment cases, names and all

Inside Higher Ed - 12 hours 31 min ago

Julie Libarkin is a passionate advocate for women in academe, specifically their right to study and work without being sexually harassed or assaulted. She’s also a scientist who loves data.

So two years ago, before much of the country had heard the words “Me Too” in reference to sexual misconduct, Libarkin began to meticulously collect information on -- and, most significantly, the names of -- publicly documented harassers.

Her list of more than 700 cases differs from others created in the Me Too era in that it includes only substantiated reports, based on strict criteria, including institutional findings and admissions of misconduct, settlements between institutions and accusers, and legal findings of fact. Cases where the accused resigned or died during an investigation also are included. This is not a “Shitty Media Men” list for academics, though the men (and the significantly smaller share of women) on it have done shitty things.

“This is a lot of work. I spend hours a week on this," Libarkin said. "But I'm trying to make the hidden visible."

Still, Libarkin is frustrated by all that remains invisible: it’s well-known that most sexual misconduct goes unreported, and much that does get reported doesn’t make it to the public sphere. So strict are Libarkin’s research parameters, both out of scientific integrity and a fear of possible legal action against her, that she won’t publish cases she learns about from institutional paperwork handed over to her by accusers -- at least not without requesting and verifying it herself through open-records channels.

“This is very biased sample,” Libarkin said of her list, cautioning against drawing hard conclusions from it, thus far. Additional research is in the works, however, to try to get a "clearer picture of the nature of sexual misconduct in academia. We often say that sexual harassment is mostly perpetrated by men and towards women, but this sample provides empirical data to begin to let us understand gender makeup more deeply." Libarkin said she and a colleague also are interested in determining "whether or not consequences for misconduct are far-reaching, or if those who engage in sexual misconduct are able to move on to positions of power," receive awards, or more.

Given that many academic harassment conversations focus on unwanted attention or contact by faculty members, Libarkin did note that her list includes  high-ranking administrators. There are also staffers for sexual harassment and assault compliance offices, gender studies professors, and those who “are supposed to know better.” She observed that some cases go beyond common conceptions of harassment, to involve stalking, murder and suicide.

“This started as an advocacy project. I was really just researching and documenting cases, and within days and weeks it just kept growing,” she said. “And as I was looking for sexual harassment, I realized there’s a whole category of behaviors that we understand as misconduct, from violation of pornography policies to stalking. Sexual misconduct is this umbrella term, so I came up with a research protocol for exactly what to look for.”

Source: Julie Libarkin

Along with legal accouncements, Libarkin relies heavily on news stories to build her database. Yet she began the document mostly due to annoyance at the news media and its tendency to cover misconduct as what she described as “one-offs” at “institutions that are deemed special for some reason.”

Every once in a while Libarkin reads a piece about whether a particular discipline has a “problem,” she said, while the reality -- both publicly documented and based on experience -- is that harassment happens across fields, too often.

“These cases are presented as unusual,” she said. “But they are not unusual.”

Those observations are similar to what Karen Kelsky, a former tenured professor and founder of The Professor Is In, found in her massive crowdsourced document of harassment in academe. That database does not include names in most cases, and many reports are unsubstantiated.

Misconduct is not new: Libarkin’s database includes a recently documented case from 1917. She also noted there was surge of public cases in the 2000s, when there was a rising consciousness about harassment. Nowadays, she said, reports surge when there are public-records requests.

Libarkin said she’s received mostly positive feedback about her spreadsheet, which 89 people were reading late morning on Wednesday. Some of the responses are “traumatizing,” she said, recalling how a colleague pressed his pelvis into her back at a work-related party in 2010 -- the first day in a year she’d worn a dress, out of fear of something like that happening. She later reported the incident, but as the professor already was emeritus, the consequences were, to her mind, few. 

That professor's name is not incuded in the document.

Editorial Tags: FacultyGraduate studentsMisconductImage Caption: Julie LibarkinIs this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: 

Growing needs and changing demographics strain college fund-raising

Inside Higher Ed - 12 hours 31 min ago

A look at the student bodies and the development staffs of many colleges and universities might make evident the demographic mismatch occurring at institutions across the country -- the students are more diverse in race and income; the development staff members are largely white.

This was not a problem when deep-pocketed donors were mostly white and male, but it will likely present fund-raising challenges at many colleges going forward. A new generation of moneyed philanthropists has come of age -- women, people of color, people who identify as LGBTQ -- who not only want to support their alma maters but specifically want to help people who look like them or share similar backgrounds or life experiences. Their numbers are expected to keep growing and surpass the limited pool of fund-raisers that reflect the increasing diversity of donors.

Meanwhile, a shortage of fund-raisers overall is exacerbating the problem. Colleges are relying more heavily on donors to help defray the costs of rising tuition for a student body with less ability to pay, but data projections indicate the shortage of fund-raisers will increase over time with retirements. Experts say the problem will worsen if replacement workers aren't demographically representative of a changing donor base.

"People in the industry, especially higher ed chief advancement officers, deeply feel the crunch in fund-raising," said Liz Rothenberg, managing director of EAB Strategic Research, an education best practices research, technology and services firm. "They don't feel that they have the pipeline to replace those senior fund-raisers, especially diverse fund-raisers."

"Several factors are driving this need," said Brian Gawor, vice president for research at consulting firm Ruffalo Noel Levitz.

"Very few people know that being a fund-raiser is a profession, and that's because our profession is relatively young," he said. "The massive increase in registered nonprofits has also indicated a huge need."

Rothenberg said 20 percent of senior fund-raisers plan to retire in the next four years. She also noted that only 11 percent of front-line fund-raisers or gift officers are people of color, according to Association of Fundraising Professionals estimates. And just 12 percent of people from diverse backgrounds work in the profession over all, according to the Council for Advancement and Support of Education, or CASE.

"College fund-raising is not keeping pace with changing student demographics," Rothenberg said. "There's a lot of worry, especially if you consider that the U.S. will be a majority-minority country in 2045."

CASE recently launched a national effort to address those very challenges. It started a yearlong fund-raising residency program for college graduates as a gateway to fund-raising careers in higher ed.

The program is part of CASE's larger plans to grow and diversify the shrinking ranks of institutional fund-raisers, said Bob Henry, the organization's vice president of education who oversees global strategy on talent management.

"It made sense for us to build a pipeline and enhance diversity," he said, noting that a summer internship program CASE has run for the past three years is also part of the effort. "Some of those interns will graduate and be able to roll right into the residency program."

Henry said the residency program addresses a key concern of alumni donors who "expect to see a diverse work force" on college campuses.

"We think that it's important that alumni are interacting with people who are like themselves," he said. "You're getting voices now that can resonate with your alumni, your community and your student body."

Fund-raising experts widely agree that alumni are more likely to donate to their alma maters when approached by fund-raisers who are of the same race or gender, belong to the same affinity group, or share similar life experiences.

"Demographics is important because a lot of fund-raising is about building relationships and trust," Rothenberg said. She said trust building works when the donor knows the fund-raiser shares a similar background or life story and understands how it may have influenced the donor's experience on campus.

"This is not because donors are racists," said Gawor. "It's because they are looking for a connection. How are you going to get people to give when they're not seeing people who look like them benefiting?"

Although there is more diversity today among philanthropists, the majority continue to be white men, which "matches the demographics of our current fund-raisers," Rothenberg said.

"That's not a problem today, but it's going to be a problem down the road when the younger alumni or students of today are in a position to make a donation 10 or 15 years down the road," she said. "We're seeing that with women donors, black and Latino donors, and LGBT donors."

Until relatively recently, however, most people who went into philanthropy work did not follow a set academic or career path. Instead, they "fell into" fund-raising by happenstance after a friend or a mentor introduced them to the world of philanthropy or helped them land a related job.

"Just hoping people fall into the profession is not a talent recruitment strategy, and it's not a sustainable one," Rothenberg said.

Jesus Rangel is among those who initially entered the profession unintentionally. He's now one of 18 recent college graduates -- people of color, first in their families to attend college, children of immigrants -- placed in fund-raising-related jobs at colleges and universities across the country as part of the CASE residency program.

Rangel, 23, attended Texas State University intending to eventually become a lawyer. He majored in political science, planned for law school and got "super involved" on campus at the start of his freshman year.

He became an official "university ambassador," led campus tours for prospective students and took part in donor events, alumni award banquets, tailgate parties and more. He met the university's vice president for advancement during one of those social gatherings.

"We kind of made a connection," Rangel said.

She became his mentor and invited him to fund-raising events and introduced him to donors and prospective donors with whom she had cultivated relationships. Rangel knew nothing about her line of work but found it interesting.

"Seeing the work that she did and the impact these donors had on students made me want to have an impact, too," he said.

Rangel, who grew up in rural Texas, is a first-generation college student from a working-class family. He said he realized he could help other young people like him attend college by raising money to fund scholarships.

By the time he graduated last May, he'd changed his mind about becoming a lawyer.

Last month, he started his residency at Oregon State University as a social media specialist and fund-raiser. He's currently helping plan the university's first Day of Giving campaign scheduled for next April and is seeking out current students and alumni among various affinity groups, including African Americans, people who identify as LGBTQIA and members of Greek organizations, to get involved.

"Students giving back isn't very big here," Rangel explained. "Just looking at the analytics of student giving, you can see it's a very small percentage. I think it can be brought up."

He said the university is considering a Philanthropy Week of events leading up to the Day of Giving to get students, prospective donors and community members energized about giving.

"We're trying to develop ways to get that culture of philanthropy in their mind-set," Rangel said. "Articles that I've read about fund-raising say that some institutions introduce that culture of philanthropy the moment you walk in the door as a freshman so by the time you graduate you have that mind-set of donating your time, talent or treasure," he said.

Rangel is now on a completely different career track than when he first started college. "My current path is to get my master's degree in business and then get my Ph.D. in higher education and become president of a university one day."

Viet Nguyen, 23, who is doing his fund-raising residency at his alma mater, Ohio State University, also hopes to become a university president. He was also a university ambassador and then became a presidential host at his campus. Both opportunities brought him into contact with university leaders, alumni and donors. Still, he didn't consider fund-raising as a career option until his senior year.

"I never saw myself as a fund-raiser," he said. "I did cold-calling in high school and always hated that. The university ambassador program really helped me shape my future career."

Nguyen was born and raised in Columbus, Ohio. His parents are immigrants from Vietnam. After graduating with dual bachelor's degrees in strategic communications and business administration, he will work in different areas of the university's advancement department during his residency.

Now he spends his days talking with alumni "and trying to get them to give back to the university." At the end of those conversations, he shares "a perspective story" of why he chose to attend Ohio State in hopes of making that connection that might lead to a donation.

Zachary Price was also introduced to fund-raising through a mentor, an administrator in the advancement office of North Carolina A&T State University, where he earned a bachelor's degree in civil engineering.

Price now works as a strategic analyst in Dartmouth College's office of Development Research and Prospect Management, where he supports front-line officers performing wealth assessments of potential donors.

"It's been great," he says of the job. He and the other program participants met over the summer at CASE's annual Summer Institute in Educational Fundraising held at Dartmouth.

"As a cohort we have a lot of potential to learn from one another," Price said. "There's a lot of diversity among us."

He considers himself "a product of philanthropy" because he attended North Carolina A&T on a full academic scholarship. He also understands the financial hardships faced by friends who didn't have scholarships.

"I saw so many students who just didn't have the resources to stay in school even though they had the ability to do well," Price said.

He tried to help those students when he became president of the campus chapter of the Alpha Lambda Delta national honor society and created three $500 scholarships that have since been increased to $500, $750 and $1,000. He did something similar as president of the Black Graduate Student Association at Indiana University, where he helped raise money to create a $600 scholarship to help a graduate student fund research.

Those experiences, he said, "Let me know that there was a skill set there that needed to be tended to and help me understand that I really had a passion for it."

At Indiana, Price met more people involved in fund-raising who became mentors, including a professor of philanthropic studies at the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, who suggested he attend an African American Development Officers Network conference in Cincinnati.

Price graduated from Indiana in May with a master's degree in higher ed and student affairs and a graduate certificate in institutional research. Since immersing himself in fund-raising, Price sees how little knowledge people outside the field, particularly students, have about fund-raising work.

"If you don't know the right people and don't ask about it, you wouldn't know about it," he said.

That lack of knowledge may change over time as fund-raising and philanthropy are integrated into more higher ed curricula.

"There are now over 50 philanthropy masters' programs," said Gawor of Ruffalo Noel Levitz. "A few years ago there were just a couple."

In the interim, people like Price are encouraging former grad school classmates to consider fund-raising careers that develop skills "that are very transferable to other fields."

Nikia Washington found that external motivation at Bowling Green State University long before she was accepted into the residency program. During her time at the Ohio institution, she helped raise money for the Children's Miracle Network, a nonprofit organization that supports children's hospitals.

After graduation, she worked as an au pair in France for a year, traveled and did some "soul-searching." She returned to her native Detroit and got a job in 2015 as an executive assistant to the president of the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History.

Washington's boss knew that she'd done a short stint as a campaign manager for the United Way and allowed her to do some development work for the museum, which happened to be marking its 50th anniversary as it struggled to keep operating.

"I had some ideas from my work at the United Way and my work on campus in Ohio," she said. She did "prospect research," which involves finding potential donors to the museum.

"And that's what pushed me into thinking how to go back to school to do more work in philanthropy," Washington said.

Washington, 28, is now a CASE resident at the University of Washington, where she works in the advancement office. She's also a full-time graduate student at the university studying public administration with a focus on philanthropy.

She's researching how to build strategic philanthropic models to serve underresourced and underserved communities. She's particularly interested in black philanthropy but wants to build models that can also apply to Muslim philanthropy and other groups, and that will also engage young people.

"That stems from being at the museum and seeing this fabulous museum almost having to shut its doors in a majority-black city," she said.

Her specialized approach is indicative of how fund-raising is changing as the field is being transformed by new people with different perspectives.

"More and more fund-raising will be controlled by women and people of color," said Gawor. "We have to build that pipeline and we have to be deliberate about it."

Editorial Tags: Fund-RaisingImage Caption: Recent college graduates taking part in a new fund-raising training program started by the Council for Advancement and Support of Education.Is this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: College: Bowling Green State University-Main CampusDartmouth CollegeIndiana University-BloomingtonOhio State UniversityOregon State UniversityTexas State University SystemUniversity of Washington-Seattle Campus

UCLA student sues fraternities, says they should do more to protect against rape

Inside Higher Ed - 12 hours 31 min ago

More than a year ago, a female student at the University of California, Los Angeles, told the institution she was raped in August 2016. Her attacker, she alleged, had already sexually assaulted another of her sorority sisters.

The university found her accusation credible. It expelled the young man, a campus fraternity member, in 2017. In February, he lost his appeal to return to campus.

But the student who filed the complaint was not satisfied. She maintains that the expelled student's fraternity -- and UCLA's fraternity system as a whole -- should have known the assault could occur and should have protected her. The fraternity had hosted a party that August night during which she drank until she couldn't walk, she said.

Last month, the student anonymously filed a lawsuit against her alleged rapist, Blake Lobato (who is named in court documents and whose identity has been widely reported), and his fraternity, Zeta Beta Tau, as well as Sigma Alpha Epsilon and the UCLA Interfraternity Council, the governing body of the university's 22 fraternities. Though the council is a registered student group, it is independent from the institution, which is not named as a defendant.

Her lawsuit comes at a time when the Trump administration intends to overhaul the regulations around Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the federal gender antidiscrimination law that bars sexual misconduct at colleges and universities.

U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos last year rolled back Obama-era rules around Title IX, declaring them unfairly slanted against accused students. The Education Department's proposal on Title IX, a draft version of which was leaked to Inside Higher Ed, likely would not even have allowed for an investigation into Jane Doe's case, as institutions would no longer be obligated to investigate assaults that occurred off campus. Title IX experts are debating whether this provision would pass legal muster, as the law is triggered when a hostile environment in present on campus -- such as the presence of a rapist -- regardless of whether an incident occurred on the grounds or not.

Lobato’s lawyer has argued that UCLA's findings against his client were flawed and has requested that a Superior Court judge overturn the sanctions.

A particularly prominent part of the lawsuit are the allegations that fraternities' misconduct isn't isolated to just UCLA -- that alcohol abuse and sexual assaults run rampant among other chapters nationwide, with recent incidents at SAE's chapters at the University of Missouri, Clemson University, Oklahoma University, Northwestern University, the University of Southern California, California State University, Long Beach, and others, as well as ZBT's chapters at Cornell University, Florida State University, the University of Central Florida and the University of Michigan.

The local and national chapters of the fraternities and the Interfraternity Council have either not responded to requests for comment from Inside Higher Ed or declined to comment on the lawsuit. However, the national chapter of ZBT, through spokeswoman Risa Morris, provided a statement:

Zeta Beta Tau was recently notified of a lawsuit against a former member of the Alpha Rho Chapter at the University of California, Los Angeles, which involves serious allegations against that former member. Though the alleged incident did not occur in connection with any fraternity event, Zeta Beta Tau is deeply disturbed by these allegations. We continue to work with our chapters and with universities to prevent campus sexual assault, provide allies for survivors, and encourage healthy relationships.

That is why, contrary to recent news reports, both chapter presidents and Irving Chase, the chapter advisor to whom the plaintiff described her allegations, advised her to report those allegations to the proper university authorities.

In August 2016, Doe alleges she attended a party sponsored by SAE, where its members served copious amounts of alcohol -- a violation of UCLA and fraternity rules. Despite the fact that both Doe and Lobato were intoxicated, they were continually served without anyone checking their IDs -- SAE members hadn't hired security or supervision for the party.

The lawsuit states that around midnight, Doe was tired and tried to leave the party, but was too drunk to walk home on her own, so she went back to wait for the gathering to wind down. On her walk back to the party, she encountered Lobato, who encouraged her to "hang out" with him at the ZBT house.

Once there, Doe said she saw multiple brothers, but none of them intervened to prevent the assault, even though she was obviously drunk.

Doe lay down, slipping in and out of consciousness. She alleges that Lobato raped her and that she told him "No" multiple times and tried to push him away.

The lawsuit states that she was visibly bruised and sore days after the purported attack.

"ZBT had no mechanism of supervision or security to prevent a fraternity member from bringing an obviously drunk girl upstairs and raping them," the lawsuit states.

Doe alleges that ZBT should have known Lobato was a serial offender, as he had reportedly sexually assaulted another UCLA student earlier in 2015, an attack that the university's Title IX office confirmed. In the lawsuit, she maintains that the fraternity also should have known that students were drinking before the SAE party and should have taken steps to prevent it.

Though Doe reported the rape to the ZBT president and one of its board members, who is a lawyer, she alleges that the board member dissuaded her from filing a Title IX complaint. She did not do so until early 2017. She also told the new ZBT president about the episode that January. He promised to kick Lobato out of the fraternity.

She is suing the Greek entities -- both the UCLA and national chapters -- and the Interfraternity Council for negligence. She is suing Lobato for assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Ricardo Vazquez, a UCLA spokesman, said the institution's Office of Fraternity and Sorority Life works with the Interfraternity Council to "integrate values into their respective councils and chapters." Vazquez said Title IX investigations are confidential, but that the Title IX Office investigates allegations "carefully and impartially."

"The goal is to continually strengthen student safety within the Greek community," Vazquez said, adding that since 2014, the Campus Assault Resources and Education Office and Title IX office have trained all fraternity and sorority members on sexual assault.

In January, the Interfraternity Council approved a six-week ban on alcohol on events at fraternity houses while it developed a new risk-management policy. The new rules require a licensed third-party security guard to check IDs at the door of house parties and to give out wristbands to designate who can drink alcohol. Fraternity members at the houses cannot take visitors into a room privately unless they have reserved a space in advance. And at least two members have to patrol each party as "sober monitors" to care for those who are drunk.

Laura Dunn, founder of sexual assault survivor advocacy group SurvJustice and now a lawyer with the Fierberg National Law Group in Washington, said her firm routinely sees blame shifted about who should handle risk-management policies -- local or national branches of Greek organizations, or the institutions. She said fraternities, like many male-only groups, "self-insulate" from liability -- forming a brotherhood that protects them and perpetuates harm.

"But the reality is, it is left to 'young adults' whose lives are forever changed when they engaged either directly with criminal conduct through Greek life … or indirectly through working to cover up such misconduct after the fact. To break the cycle, nationals and universities need to work together. Lawsuits like this will force that accountability until society responds," Dunn said.

Editorial Tags: Sexual assaultTitle IXIs this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: College: University of California, Los Angeles

New report encourages use of multiple measurements for student placement

Inside Higher Ed - 12 hours 31 min ago

New research shows more community college students pass college-level courses in math and English when multiple measurements are used to determine their placement rather than relying solely on a single placement exam.

The report from the Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness at Columbia University's Teachers College found that when colleges use multiple measurements, such as grade point averages, the placement of students into college-level math instead of developmental courses increased by five percentage points. That increase was more than 30 percentage points for college-level English.

Students who placed into these college-level courses were also more likely to pass them in their first semester compared to remedial students. In the college-level courses, students could receive additional support to help them pass. Meanwhile, it may take remedial students an additional semester or two before they can enroll in the college-level course.

“We’ve got enough evidence now for people to move in the direction of using multiple measurements,” said Elisabeth Barnett, the lead researcher on the project from the Community College Research Center and a co-author of the report. “One thing becoming clearer is that high school GPA is an especially good measurement.”

The researchers followed 13,000 students at seven State University of New York community colleges who took courses in 2016 and 2017. At SUNY colleges, the College Board’s Accuplacer exam is used to determine placement. Students in the study were either assigned placement using Accuplacer or were placed using alternative measurements such as high school GPA, performance on state exams or high school class rank.

Preliminary results for about 5,000 of those students show that 14 percent were placed higher with multiple measurements than they would have been with a single assessment, while 7 percent placed lower. In English, 41.5 percent of students were placed in a higher-level course and 6.5 percent placed lower.

The use of multiple measurements for placement also had an impact on course completion. Students were 3.1 percentage points more likely to enroll in and complete a college-level math course in the first semester after being placed with multiple measurements compared to those who were placed with a single assessment. In English, students were 12.5 percentage points more likely to enroll in and complete the college-level course.

The research also found impacts related to gender and racial equity. More women than men were placed in the higher college-level math course under multiple measurements, while black and Hispanic students benefited more than their white peers with placement in college-level English.

“What we’re learning is that it’s hard to capture what students have the potential to do with a single test,” Barnett said. “There are so many factors that determine whether and why students will be successful in a course, and high school GPA is capturing noncognitive factors like, did they turn in an assignment? Did they show up? Did they follow through?”

While the CAPR study will continue to evaluate the performance of these students for more semesters, Barnett said the body of research has been clear that using a single placement exam does not work.

Placement Changes in California

A few states and college systems have in recent years enacted policies that require institutions to use multiple measurements. A survey earlier this year found that in 2016, 57 percent of two-year colleges used this approach for math placement, compared to 27 percent in 2011. North Carolina’s community college system, for example, has been using multiple measurements for placement. Last year, California passed a bill requiring the state’s 114 community colleges to begin using multiple measurements for placement in corequisite remediation courses by next year. Corequisite is the popular form of remediation that places students in college-level courses but gives them additional support.

The Public Policy Institute of California found that a large number of students never took or completed college-level courses when a single placement exam put them in traditional remedial courses.

For example, of the students who placed four levels below college-level courses in remedial math, only 8 percent eventually completed the college-level courses.

"It’s pretty appalling and compelling data that students in many cases were starting not just one level below, but two or three or four levels below college level,” said Hans Johnson, senior policy fellow and Higher Education Center director at PPIC. “But strikingly, the share of students who made it out of remediation was much lower. When we’re talking remediation in this lesser system, it would be a year at best for students placed two levels below to reach a college-level course.”

Although a few of California’s two-year colleges started using multiple measurements years ago, there are still many that are starting this system or revamping remediation courses to comply with the law. And some colleges are not looking to make any changes, said Katie Hern, an English instructor at Chabot College and the co-founder and executive director of the California Acceleration Project, which has been helping colleges make the remedial changes.

“Some colleges are very ready and some are looking for loopholes,” she said. “I know colleagues at other institutions who believe this kind of change will undermine the quality of student learning; they fear teachers may dumb down the curriculum, they mistrust the data and there is this disbelief that comes from their pre-existing understanding of what is good for students.”

Geoff Hagopian, a professor of math and computer science at College of the Desert, said he’s opposed to the changes because they eliminate the basic skills curriculum for new students and populate college-level courses with students who are not ready. The idea that students will pass college-level courses because they were placed closer to that course is false, he said.

“The California Community Colleges have managed to compress into three or four semesters of remediation a process that often entails unlearning bad algorithms and reformulating poor study habits: an amazing feat, if you can pull it off,” Hagopian said in an email. “To expect that these same students are going to be more successful … without remediation is disingenuous and cynical.”

Hagopian fears that the state’s new outcomes-based funding formula, which will reward the colleges for student completions of college-level math and English, will lead to more instructors passing underprepared students in the college-level courses instead of placing them in remediation.

Hern said the financial implications of these changes in California are still unknown, because of the new performance funding metrics and because each college will differ in how they implement the changes or reallocate resources.

However, the move to multiple measurements does come with costs for some colleges. In New York, for example, the CAPR study found that across five of the SUNY colleges, building the alternative placement system added $110 per student to the current cost of using a single placement exam. Ongoing costs averaged about $40 per student.

Barnett said the next area to study will be the cost-benefit analysis of using multiple measurements to determine if it’s worth the extra expense colleges incur.

Community CollegesEditorial Tags: AssessmentIs this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: 

Students want to pursue law to give back but are discouraged by high costs

Inside Higher Ed - 12 hours 31 min ago

Undergraduates considering a law degree are motivated by a desire to contribute to the public good, but high costs and work-life balance concerns deter some of them, according to a study released today.

The study, conducted by the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) and Gallup, utilized survey responses from more than 22,000 undergraduates at 25 four-year institutions and more than 2,700 first-year law students at 44 different law schools. (Note: Inside Higher Ed works with Gallup on some surveys but had no role in this one.)

Researchers administered the survey during a dramatic dip in law school applications: between 2011 and 2016, the number of law school applications fell by 38 percent, from 87,900 to 54,500. According to Judith Areen, AALS executive director, applicant numbers plateaued in 2016 and 2017 and increased by 8 percent in 2018.

“[The application decline] brought home the need to better understand what college students think about law schools,” Areen said. “For students, the more we understand about them, the better law schools can do in meeting their expectations.”

Parental education plays a major role in student decisions about law school. Only 12 percent of American adults age 45 to 64 have an advanced degree, but 55 percent of undergraduate students considering law school had at least one parent with an advanced degree. Family members are also the primary source of advice for undergraduates considering law. To Areen, this indicates that law schools need to work harder to reach first-generation students who might not have that family network.

“Law schools and graduate schools have to do a better job of getting more information to first-generation students so they know about the possibilities and they apply on time and get all the information they need,” she said.

Law school isn't a last-minute decision. Over half of undergraduate respondents said they had considered law school before college, and one-third had considered it before high school.

“[Law schools] need to start reaching out, not just during college but even before,” Areen said.

When asked why they wanted to pursue a law degree, undergraduate students most often reported that law school would be a “pathway for a career in politics, government or public service,” that they had “a passion for or high interest in the type of work,” that a law degree would provide “opportunities to help others or to be useful to society” and that they wanted to “advocate for social change.”

“We think the reasons they give are pretty interesting and will be a surprise to people who think of lawyers as only interested in money and greed,” Areen said.

Law school tuition continues to rise. Data from Law School Transparency, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group, shows that between 2011 and 2017 the average annual sticker price for a U.S. public law school increased by about $4,500, or 17 percent, while tuition at private law schools increased by more than $7,000 -- 15 percent. Undergraduates considering law school cited high costs/potential debt and work-life balance as the greatest deterrents. So did the first-year law school students.

“Cost and work-life balance are cited by undergraduates who are still making up their mind, but the same two are cited by first-year law students,” Areen said. “So that shows us that the same two are barriers, but they still came to law school anyway.”

Jim Greif, director of communications for AALS, added that the same two deterrents were cited by students considering other types of advanced degrees, such as master's programs, Ph.D.s or medical degrees.

Other notable findings include:

  • Women are more likely than men to say that law school is too hard and that they don’t want to defend guilty people, while men are more likely to say that three years is too long and that too few jobs in the field pay enough money.
  • Fifteen percent of undergraduates considering an advanced degree reported hearing about law programs, while 55 percent of students considering law school reported hearing about them. This may be due to confirmation bias, that students who are interested in law degrees will seek out and remember information about law school.
  • Students with a lower grade point average are more likely to pursue law school because it could lead to a higher-paying job rather than because they're passionate about the work or see law as a path to a career in politics or public service.
Editorial Tags: LawImage Source: iStockImage Caption: University of Michigan law schoolIs this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: 

Editors discuss new book on Rhodes Must Fall movement at Oxford

Inside Higher Ed - 12 hours 31 min ago

When a statue of Cecil Rhodes, a British mining magnate and colonizer, came down at the University of Cape Town, it was just the beginning of a now worldwide conversation about colonization in higher education. Rhodes was instrumental in founding universities and scholarship programs around the world, but he was also a noted imperialist who acted with disregard for the people who lived in much of the world. Since the statue fell in 2015, students and faculty at a number of universities have begun to argue for decolonization at their own institutions, in part by removing honors for Rhodes.

At the University of Oxford, where another statue of Rhodes still stands, student and faculty activists find themselves pushing back against those who tell them that "the past is the past" and to be grateful for Rhodes's contributions to higher education (notably, the Rhodes scholarship). Having each been involved in Rhodes Must Fall Oxford in different ways, editors Roseanne Chantiluke, Brian Kwoba and Athinangamso Nkopo put together a comprehensive story of the movement in their new book, Rhodes Must Fall (Zed Books).

All three editors answered questions about the book via email.

Q: Instead of writing one narrative about the Rhodes Must Fall movements, you strung together a series of primary accounts, interviews, poetry and writings from the protests. Why did you decide to put the book together this way?

Kwoba: We wanted to give expression to a wide range of different voices and experiences, because that is ultimately what made up the movement as a whole. Not “me” but “we.”

Nkopo: The varying accounts we put together in the book are also a reflection, to a great extent, of what the movement Rhodes Must Fall has inspired and made possible not just in South Africa but throughout higher education the world over.

Q: Why did you decide to get involved with Rhodes Must Fall at Oxford?

Kwoba: I co-founded the Rhodes Must Fall Oxford movement because I was inspired by the action that black students took at the University of Cape Town. They made the statue of Cecil Rhodes a focal point for a much larger conversation and mass movement against the white coloniality of that institution. Oxford has its own statue of Rhodes, so after our initial solidarity demonstration, we came to realize that Oxford, too, needed to be decolonized in a similar way.

Chantiluke: I decided to organize for Rhodes Must Fall Oxford because I was inspired by the fact that the movement did not seek to work within the university’s structural framework, but sought to work outside of it, in solidarity with students from across the globe.

Nkopo: I went to Oxford from the University of the Witwatersrand, and there I had already gotten involved with the Decolonise Wits movement and in organizing some of what would result in the Fees Must Fall movements. Rhodes Must Fall Oxford was a welcome and natural step in my career as an activist intellectual. It was also very appealing that the movement in Oxford was a global one in terms of the students involved and organizing in the small city.

Q: Several voices in the book, including Roseanne and Athinangamso in your "Skin Deep" interview, discuss the need to focus on decolonizing higher education rather simply implementing greater diversity and inclusion initiatives. Can you explain how those two goals are different?

Chantiluke: Diversity operates on the higher education institution’s public facing level only. It is a marketing ploy that convinces external stakeholders that a university is doing all that it can to improve the lives and experiences of brown, differently abled, LGBT+ and nonbinary people by virtue of inviting them to study there. Meanwhile, the university is allowed to operate as normal without reforming the systems, structures and attitudes that are hostile to such people. On the other hand, decolonization operates at the political, epistemic and ideological heart of the university, with reformative implications for every facet of a university’s operation. It involves the decentering of Eurocentric value systems and knowledge production, the overhaul of the hierarchy of European ideologies and the reappraisal of whitewashed history. Decolonizing the university is a prerequisite for true diversity of thought and peoples to exist there fully.

Q: What’s the biggest difference you observed between the Rhodes Must Fall movement in South Africa and the protests at Oxford?

Nkopo: In a sense, there was no great difference in terms of the structure and complexity of the university. The formerly white universities in South Africa are dominated by white academic staff and the curriculum is no different in terms of representation. The perspectives, histories and epistemological outlook of universities like UCT, where I am now a TA, are Eurocentric … Similarly, students of color there experience the kind of impostor syndrome students at Oxford experience, perhaps for slightly different reasons. The institutional culture of formerly white universities in South Africa, like in Oxford, remains white and the configuration of those spaces still uphold and glorify villainous white men and women such as Cecil John Rhodes, Jan Smuts and the like.

Kwoba: We were both up against educational institutions of white supremacy and coloniality, but in Oxford we were a tiny minority of black and Asian students in a majority-white imperialist country, whereas in SA black students are in a majority-black neocolonial country. Internally, Rhodes Must Fall in South Africa had a much clearer articulation of its political boundaries, basing itself on black consciousness, black feminism, the black radical tradition and pan-Africanism. Rhodes Must Fall in Oxford structured itself more loosely (and less politically) around decolonizing the iconography, curriculum and racial representation of the university.

Q: What do movements like Rhodes Must Fall need to do to be successful?

Kwoba: One thing we need to do better is to build links with university workers and working people in the larger urban environment in which the university is housed. The support and mobilization of community organizations, political parties, trade unions and oppressed people on a larger and extracurricular scale is what it took to kick the colonizers out historically.

Chantiluke: The demands for action and organizing can often leave very little time for a movement’s internal education. Internal education refers to conversations that relate to the ethos and ideology of a movement: What are the core principles of a movement and why/how are they formed? Should they be open to adaptation as a movement’s trajectory develops? How do we develop our thought and how do we learn? Time must be made to ensure that organizers engage in internal education as a collective with an end to ensuring consistency of ideology and ethos across organizers. Otherwise, assumptions are made about the ideological cohesiveness of organizers, which is extremely problematic.

Nkopo: We need to decentralize movements away from individuals, while preparing for a time when an organizing group have left the university as students.

Q: Similarly, where do you typically see movements falter?

Kwoba: One place that student movements often falter is by failing to train and prepare the next generation (e.g. first- and second-year students) to continue the movement. The university administration knows it can just stall until the most vocal and active students eventually graduate, and that is what often happens. Also, as one of our book chapters explains, Rhodes Must Fall Oxford really faltered on place of blackness and its relationship to feminist politics within the movement.

Chantiluke: Patriarchy always finds a way of blocking progress in these movements through the toxic social dynamics of the movement, the gendering of work and the ideas of "leadership" and hierarchy that it brings. Also, to challenge a powerful white institution as a nonwhite student involves an incredible amount of physical and psychological exertion that can be extremely destructive if left unchecked. The demands for action and organizing often appear to trump the individual demands for rest, wellness and self-care. Movements need to ensure that their organizers are looked after as much as possible and must operate on a politics of radical compassion.

New Books About Higher EducationDiversityEditorial Tags: BooksIs this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: 

Chronicle of Higher Education: U. of Tennessee Considers a Politically Connected Businessman to Run Its System

Randy Boyd doesn’t have experience in academe, but the scandal-plagued system could use “an outside-in perspective,” as the chair of the Board of Trustees put it.

Chronicle of Higher Education: Journals Retract 6 More Articles by a Controversial Cornell Food Scientist

Brian Wansink called the latest retractions, which bring his total to more than a dozen, “very unjust.” Meanwhile, the university said its own investigation of the researcher is about to conclude.

Chronicle of Higher Education: How Notre Dame Rethought Its Core Curriculum

The university recategorized core courses into “ways of knowing” and added flexibility to its requirements.

Kent College to open school in Hong Kong

The PIE News - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 09:34

Canterbury’s Kent College is to open a new school in Hong Kong in 2020 to boost the international reputation of the school. It will be the second overseas school for Kent College after Kent College Dubai opened in 2016.

At a recent signing ceremony in Canterbury, executive headmaster of Kent College, David Lamper, was joined by Stephen Ho of MacGregor Education to mark the official establishment of Kent College Hong Kong.

“Kent College is a highly regarded UK independent school with a global perspective”

The signing of the agreement signifies further international investment in the Kent College brand which is now recognised internationally, and further international projects are currently being explored in other areas of Asia and the Middle East.

Speaking at the signing, Lamper said Kent College is delighted to be working with such a well-established partner as MacGregor Education Consulting Limited and Ho, who has great integrity and an international academic reputation.

“This agreement will form a strong basis for Kent College in Hong Kong, which will reflect the values and ethos of the home school in Canterbury, and will add to the international reputation of the school,” he said.

Ho added that they are very much honoured to become the partner of Kent College.

“Kent College is a highly regarded UK independent school with a global perspective. By bringing the education standards and traditions of Kent College to Hong Kong, more students will have the chance to receiveworld-classass education,” he said.

The post Kent College to open school in Hong Kong appeared first on The PIE News.

Mariam Naneishvili, Program manager, Study in Georgia

The PIE News - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 09:12
Georgia may not be a country that automatically springs to mind as a big study destination, but the nation at the heart of the Caucasus has been proving popular with students from India and Eastern Europe, and has big plans to increase its demand, as Mariam Naneishvili, program manager at Study in Georgia, tells The PIE News.

 

The PIE News: Tell me about Study in Georgia, how is the sector doing?

Mariam Naneishvili: Study in Georgia was launched two years ago. Today we have about 10,000 international students in Georgia and we are working a lot on trying to make Georgia a new study destination. We have 70 universities and about 33 of them have launched international programs. The most popular is the medical faculty, then business. Engineering is also very popular.

The PIE: Where are students coming from?

MN: We have a great amount of students from India. Our medical faculties are very popular in India, and also [with students] from Iraq, Israel, Ukraine. We have students from Turkey and from Azerbaijan.

For Europeans, such as German, French or Italian students, Georgia is not a very cosy study destination today, but we have some students from Eastern Europe and some students from Germany. Mainly they come to Tbilisi State University.

But we are working a lot to make the quality of study programs and academics higher. [We want] the employees [to be] much more qualified, and we invite national lecturers.

Georgia also is popular because the living costs are not very high for students. It’s affordable to rent an apartment in Georgia,  and people like living there. Also Georgia has a great culture, it is very interesting and has become a very popular tourist destination.

“Making a university with real European standards in Georgia is a huge step in our development”

The PIE: How important are scholarships?

MN: Scholarships are important, we have scholarships for the students we send abroad to study, the government has state scholarships for them.

For internal scholarships, such as those for people who come to study in Georgia, it’s mostly dependent on [whether] universities have scholarships to give them.

The PIE: Does the country have an internationalisation strategy, and what are its main goals?

MN: Yes, the country has an international strategy and we have an agreement with Europe. We want to make our study destination very popular. The main goal for the strategy is to have a high quality education system which we can offer to international students, and we want our alumni to [go on to work in] relevant positions in well developed countries.

The PIE: Do you expect students to stay in Georgia after their studies or to go back?

MN: Mainly I think they go back to their countries. There are not many employment opportunities but the government is working a lot to improve the situation.

The PIE: And in terms of language of instruction, are all the courses in English? Do international students have to learn Georgian?

MN: No, we have international programs and we have programs taught in English, in German, in French but mainly most of the programs are in English. In Georgia everyone speaks English so we have a lot of schools that can offer lectures in English. It’s not a problem.

The PIE: How easy is it for international students to integrate into the wider society?

MN: I think it is quite easy, because Georgia is very famous for our friendly, hospitable character, so I think that living in Georgia and communicating with Georgian people can’t be unpleasant for anybody.

The PIE: You talked about a plan to make Georgia a great destination, can you tell us more?

MN: The government of Georgia today is working on a revolutionary project that is called Kutaisi University Complex.

The founder of this university is the former prime minister of Georgia, Bidzina Ivanishvili. It will be a huge university city and we will reach 60,000 students. It is a huge project.

“In Georgia everyone speaks English so we have a lot of schools that can offer lectures in English”

Our partner is the Technical University of Munich and all study programs are agreed to by TUM. It means that the quality of the academic programs and the quality of the professors will be very high. So after opening this university we will give a new opportunity to international students to learn about new study programs which are really very highly appreciated.

We will start with about 3,000 students, and year-by-year we want to make it bigger and bigger.

It will be in Kutaisi, the second city in Georgia and I think that it is good for the Kutaisi city development. I think it will be really revolutionary project not only in Georgia, but in the whole Caucuses region.

The PIE: Is it important that you have partners like Technical University of Munich?

MN: It is very important because TUM is a really very good university in Europe. With the rankings and the history, it’s an old university with a fantastic practice and study programs. Making a university with real European standards in Georgia is a huge step in our development.

The post Mariam Naneishvili, Program manager, Study in Georgia appeared first on The PIE News.

International tertiary numbers up 200% in two decades – OECD

The PIE News - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 08:18

The number of international students in higher education programs worldwide has more than doubled in less than two decades – rising from two million in 1998 to five million in 2016 – with a strong focus on STEM and doctoral programs, according to OECD’s latest Education at a Glance report.

The 2018 edition, which examines education systems across 35 OECD countries and various partner countries, found that advanced degrees continue to attract more international students than bachelor’s or equivalent degrees.

“There has been a huge increase in internationalisation, and that trend is pretty much unabated”

It found that while international students accounted for only 6% of total enrolment in tertiary education in 2016, they represented more than a quarter (26%) of enrolment in doctoral programs in OECD counties.

International enrolment was also significant at master’s level (17%) where on average across the OECD there is more than one international student for every 10 students at this level.

However international enrolment in bachelor’s programs was shown to remain relatively low (below 5%) in many countries, with exceptions including Austria, Luxembourg and New Zealand where more than 15% of students at bachelor’s level are international.

The report suggested several factors that could account for these trends, including capacity constraints in the student’s countries of origin at advanced levels of education, the availability of narrow specialisations in host countries or post-migration programs.

Meanwhile, for host countries, it read, there are strong incentives to invest in later stages of education “because graduates at that level make a large contribution to R&D and innovation, and to addressing socio-economic challenges”.

“There has been a huge increase in internationalisation due to more people having access [to education] and high enough income to have their children studying in other countries, and that trend is, pretty much, unabated,” explained Andreas Schleicher, director for education and skills at OECD in a webinar.

In terms of contributing countries, he said students from Asia were found to be more internationally mobile at short-cycle tertiary and master’s levels, while European students tend to be more mobile at bachelor’s and doctoral level.

According to the report, students from Asia formed the largest group of international students enrolled in OECD tertiary programs at all levels (55%) in 2016, with two-thirds converging towards Australia (15%), the UK (11%) and the US (38%).

While incoming student mobility has increased for almost all OECD and partner destination countries, and has almost doubled between 2013 and 2016 in Estonia, Latvia and Poland, outward mobility is more varied. The number of students leaving their country for study purposes increased noticeably in Hungary, India, Italy, Spain and Saudi Arabia, in particular.

In terms of destinations, English-speaking countries were found to be the most attractive, with the US, UK, Australia and Canada receiving over half of the mobile students.

However, France and Germany were also shown to be major host destinations, which the report put down to a variety of domestic and external factors and initiatives including tertiary-education programs taught in English. These have resulted in Germany surpassing its goal of hosting 350,000 international students three years early and France being named the most popular destination after Canada.

Russia was also found to be a major destination country, with 250,000 students enrolled from abroad in 2016.

“Lower language proficiency required in STEM could partly explain the internationalisation of these fields”

International students were shown to favour fields in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, with one-third of them enrolled in STEM fields in 2016.

International students also represented at least 9% of tertiary enrolment in natural sciences, mathematics and statistics, and ICT, and 7% in engineering, manufacturing and construction.

“The lower language proficiency required to perform in STEM could partly explain the internationalisation of these fields of study,” the report noted.

But the central role played by science, engineering and business management, and the career opportunities associated with graduating in these disciplines may be of greater importance, the report continued.

“Attracting mobile students, especially if they stay permanently, is a way to tap into a global pool of talent, compensate for weaker capacity at lower educational levels, support the development of innovation and production systems and, in many countries, to mitigate the impact of an ageing population.”

However, it warned that there is a risk of squeezing out domestic students from institutions that differentiate tuition fees by student origin, as they may tend to give preference to international students who generate higher revenues.

It explained that as part of their internationalisation strategy, more institutions are creating offshore satellite campuses, dual degrees, changing admission rules, teaching in foreign languages and offering online courses and international internships.

“And as a consequence, the international activities of tertiary educational institutions have not only expanded in volume and scope, but also in complexity,” it concluded.

The post International tertiary numbers up 200% in two decades – OECD appeared first on The PIE News.

Campaign hopes students will choose Montréal

The PIE News - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 06:59

The question of what to do and where to go after studying abroad is a common one, and one the Canadian sector is leading on answering.

After successful programs (which are continuing) such as Nova Scotia’s ‘Stay in Scotia‘ initiative the city of Montréal, capital of Canada’s francophone province Québec, is asking international graduates to “Choose Montréal”.

“There’s a lot of needs… Montreal is a big [artificial intelligence] hub”

Montréal International is the city’s own international development agency, which hopes to boost the city and wider region’s attractiveness to international business and aide investment in the area. The organisation has launched “Je Choisis Montréal“, or “I Choose Montréal” in English, along with institutional and industry partners, as well as the Ministry of Immigration (Québec).

The city is hoping to capitalise on being named the best ‘student city’ in the Americas, according to QS, as well as Nestpick’s judgement that it is the second best global city for “millennials”.

The project will connect students with cultural and social activities in the city and surrounding area, as providing recruitment advice and assistance for graduates looking for work, and immigration advice for those looking to acquire permanent residency.

The organisation will also assist employers, by connecting them with graduates and promoting their vacancies through social media and “joint activities”.

One area where possibilities for expansion and post-study work are rife is the video game and tech industries, according to Montréal International’s students projects director, Mathieu Lefort.

“There’s a lot of needs, for example, in video games, video effects. Montreal is a big [artificial intelligence] hub and really well known,” he told local broadcaster CTV.

The power of the startup industry’s pull towards the city is shown by programs like the Holt fintech Accelerator, which attracted firms from around the world to Montréal this year.

Although the francophone-first nature of Québec will naturally attract many French students, as UQAM and other institutions already do, but range of graduate voices portrayed on the campaign’s website makes it clear the aim is much broader, and the city hopes to attract truly global talent to the multi-lingual and historically multi-cultural city.

The post Campaign hopes students will choose Montréal appeared first on The PIE News.

Flywire raises $100 million in funds

The PIE News - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 05:22

Flywire, the startup company that aids universities, hospitals and business with foreign currency payments has announced it has raised $100 million in series D venture funding.

The main investors are Temasek, a Singapore investment company with a $235 billion portfolio, which led this round of investment, with existing backers Bain Capital Venture and Fidelity’s F-Prime Capital also featuring prominently.

“Additional investment from Temasek will help us take full advantage of the potential”

Formally known as peerTransfer, Flywire was founded in 2009 by Spanish entrepreneur Iker Marcaide and solves international students’ international fund transfer issues, along with streamlining other cross-border payments.

The firm, which is based in Boston with offices around the globe, claims to have processed over $8bn in international transfers since 2009.

Mike Massaro, CEO, put the company’s success down to its ability to iron out complex issues in international fund transfer systems.

“By taking the friction out of initiating, processing and reconciling large-sum international and domestic payments, we empower our clients to capitalise on their business opportunities and optimise their customer relationships,” he said.

“The potential for Flywire is massive and the additional investment and guidance from Temasek will help us take full advantage of it,” he added.

The new investment round, and significant capital acquired, comes off the back of a year of expansion and growth. Flywire has moved into Singapore, China, Japan, Australia and Ireland, and stated 80% international growth since summer 2017. 

Matt Harris, managing director at Bain Capital Ventures (a current investor) said the new capital will help Flywire grow in the APAC region, which the company itself has stated as aim for the next 12 months.

“The company has consistently outperformed expectations and demonstrated its ability to run and grow a global business at scale,” he said.

“The addition of Temasek optimises their ability to capitalise on that opportunity and provides really valuable insights into the fast-growing Asia–Pac market.”

Along with expanding in Asia–Pacific, the firm aims to move into the Latin American, Middle East and African markets in 2019.

 

 

The post Flywire raises $100 million in funds appeared first on The PIE News.

Five-year higher education disability strategy approved

University World News Global Edition - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 04:04
A five-year strategy to empower people with disabilities at institutions of higher education and scientific research was approved by the Sudanese Council of Ministers from this year to 2022, in or ...

Critics say gender bias survey does not go far enough

University World News Global Edition - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 04:02
More details are needed to truly understand the extent of a bias against women who took entrance exams for Japan's medical schools, critics said, after the government this month released some of t ...

UK: Second MAC report splits opinion

The PIE News - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 03:28

The UK’s Migration Advisory Committee has set out its recommendations for what it believes would be a “desirable” migration system for the UK.

The committee, which was commissioned by the home secretary in 2017 to assess the impact of European Economic Area migrants on the country’s economy and society, has recommended moving to a system where migration is not based on “preferential access”.

“The ability to recruit international staff is vital”

“We recommend moving to a system in which all migration is managed with no preferential access to EU citizens,” MAC chairperson Alan Manning wrote in the chair’s foreword.

Migrants should be judged on factors including their skills, employment, age and use of public services, and “not fundamentally on their nationality”, the report argues.

It added that it does not see compelling reasons to offer a different set of rules to EEA and non-EEA immigrants.

A policy that provides greater access for higher-skilled migration while restricting access for lower-skilled workers to enter the UK would be consistent with the available evidence, the report stated.

Russell Group chief executive, Tim Bradshaw said that the report busted a series of “pervasive migration myths”, such as that EEA migrants do not increase UK unemployment, drive down wages or impact negatively on the training of the domestic workforce.

Despite this he labelled the report “underwhelming” and its recommendations “unworkable”.

“Scrapping the Tier 2 visa cap and Resident Labour Market Test will not be enough to reduce the burden and bureaucracy of a system that is already at breaking point.”

It was a real opportunity to steer the UK towards a more modern and intelligent immigration system, but the recommendations are unimaginative and unworkable, Bradshaw claimed.

“Under the MAC’s proposals, skilled EEA nationals would be required to wade through excessive red tape to come here, at precisely the time we should be making the UK even more attractive to international talent,” he said.

The Russell Group has proposed a European Skills Permit, based on a system of secure online accounts for future skilled EEA migrants, which builds on the digital platform already in development for the government’s EU Settlement Scheme, Bradshaw said.

Chief executive of Universities UK Alistair Jarvis welcomed the MAC’s recommendations, saying he hoped the government would take the opportunity to “reshape” the immigration system to benefit international educators.

“We welcome the recommendations which extend and increase the flexibility of the Tier 2 visa which would help with the recruitment of a broader range of workers and skills than the current system allows,” Jarvis said.

“The ability to recruit international staff at a broad range of skill levels, and with minimal barriers, is vital to the continued, global success of our universities.”

“There has been a lot of uncertainty for international staff following the Brexit vote and it’s important now that this is addressed as a final Brexit deal is reached. We hope the UK government now develops promptly a reshaped immigration system that encourages talented international university staff to choose the UK,” Jarvis continued.

The post UK: Second MAC report splits opinion appeared first on The PIE News.

Professor cites boycott of Israeli universities in declining to write recommendation letter for student

Inside Higher Ed - Wed, 09/19/2018 - 00:00

Does a professor have a right to refuse to write a recommendation for a student due to his own political convictions?

A professor at the University of Michigan declined to write a recommendation for a student to study abroad upon realizing the student’s chosen program was in Israel. In an email to the student, which was posted as a screenshot (at left) on Facebook by the pro-Israel group Club Z and was first reported by Israeli media, the professor cites support for the boycott of Israeli academic institutions as the reason why he was rescinding an offer to write a recommendation letter. At the same time he indicated he would be happy to write other letters for the student, who is identified only as “Abigail.”

"As you may know, many university departments have pledged an academic boycott against Israel in support of Palestinians living in Palestine," says the email from John Cheney-Lippold, an associate professor in the American culture and digital studies department at Michigan. "This boycott includes writing letters of recommendation for students planning to study there."

"I should have let you know earlier, and for that I apologize. But for reasons of these politics, I must rescind my offer to write your letter."

"Let me know if you need me to write other letters for you, as I'd be happy," the email concludes.

“I firmly stand by the decision because I stand against inequality, I stand against oppression and occupation, I stand against apartheid and I use that word very, very seriously," Cheney-Lippold said in a phone interview with Inside Higher Ed.

He confirmed that he sent the email but clarified that he made a mistake in saying that many university departments have supported the boycott against Israeli universities. What he should have said is that many individual professors do.

Cheney-Lippold said it is appropriate for professors' political and ethical stances to inform their choices of whether and when to write letters on their students' behalf. "The idea of writing a letter of recommendation is a part of being a professor where your own subjectivity comes into play," he said. "I don’t want professors to be seen as just rubber-stamping … A professor should have a decision on how their words will be taken and where their words will go."

"I have extraordinary political and ethical conflict lending my name to helping that student go to that place."

The University of Michigan, for its part, issued a statement affirming its opposition to the boycott of Israeli academic institutions, and clarifying that no academic department or unit has taken a stance in support of it.

"Injecting personal politics into a decision regarding support for our students is counter to our values and expectations as an institution," the university said in a statement issued Tuesday. An earlier statement from the university described the faculty member's decision as "disappointing," but that language was removed from the subsequent statement, which a spokesman said was revised for purposes of concision.

The case raises complex questions for professors about academic freedom and faculty obligations. Generally, most would probably agree that principles of academic freedom give a professor every right to refuse to write a letter on the basis of a student's poor academic performance. But to what extent is writing recommendation letters a faculty duty such that refusing to write one for nonacademic reasons breaks an unwritten social contract? How should institutions balance academic freedom with the expectation that faculty will write letters to support their students' academic goals -- that is, when their performance in the classroom merits it?

The questions at issue are not settled ones, even from the perspective of the main body that advocates for faculty freedoms and rights, the American Association of University Professors. The AAUP has a long-standing policy of opposing academic boycotts.

“In general, AAUP policy does not address whether faculty are obligated to write letters of reference,” said Hans-Joerg Tiede, the associate secretary of the AAUP's Department of Academic Freedom, Tenure and Governance. “I think that it's generally understood that writing such letters falls within the professional duties of faculty members. I also think that it's generally understood that faculty members may decline to write a particular letter in particular instances, for example, because they believe that they have insufficient information on which to base such a letter. In general, refusing to write a letter of reference on grounds that are discriminatory would appear to be at odds with the AAUP’s Statement on Professional Ethics."

John K. Wilson, the co-editor of the AAUP's blog, "Academe," said, "Writing a letter of recommendation is not like teaching a class; it is a voluntary activity, and not a necessary part of one’s academic work. Professors are given broad discretion to decide how, and if, to write a letter. And they can decline if they think the opportunity is not in the best interests of the student, even if the student disagrees."

"However, I think it is morally wrong for professors to impose their political views on student letters of recommendation." Wilson stressed however, that the professor should not be punished. "If a professor was systematically refusing to write letters of recommendation because they are time-consuming and unrewarded in academia, it might be appropriate for colleagues to judge it as a small mark against them on the service criterion. But a singular case like this certainly should not be punished in any way," he said.

Cary Nelson, a former AAUP president and an opponent of the movement to boycott Israeli academic institutions, argued on the other hand that the professor could be punished. "What the professor did violated the student’s academic freedom -- the right to apply to study at any program anywhere in the world," said Nelson, a professor emeritus of English and Jewish culture and society at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Nelson said he believes it is a violation of professional ethics for a professor to decline to write a letter for a student on the basis of politics. A faculty member has the right not to write a recommendation, but not based on political objections to the university or nation in which the student is interested in studying, or the student’s own politics, Nelson argued.

Max Samarov, the executive director of research and campus strategy for StandWithUs, a pro-Israel organization, accused the professor of dereliction of duty. StandWithUs opposes the spread of the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel on campuses and views BDS as an "expression of the new anti-Semitism that targets the Jewish state instead of Jewish people."

"This professor's job is to help students educate themselves about the world. Refusing to do his job simply because it conflicts with his personal politics is reprehensible. The fact that he did this in service of a discriminatory agenda like BDS only makes it worse," Samarov said.

Reflecting a different view, David Klein, a professor of mathematics at California State University, Northridge, and a member of the organizing collective of the U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, argued it was the professor’s prerogative not to write the letter. Klein, who opposes study abroad programming in Israel, said he agreed with Cheney-Lippold's decision.

"First of all, a professor has a right to decline a request to write a letter of recommendation under any circumstances: that’s a choice a professor makes about a student and a goal. In this case I think it’s the ethical thing to do. The study abroad program for Israel is really a propaganda program to legitimize the apartheid system in Israel and I think it’s proper for a professor to object to participate in that," Klein said.

Asked whether a professor’s political views can constitute valid reasons not to write a recommendation, Klein said, “I think that’s a complicated question, because politics is a very broad category. But within politics there are ethical principles, too. Antiracism is a political position, and I think antiracism is a legitimate political position to invoke in situations like this, whereas other more superficial political considerations like Republican versus Democrat would not be appropriate.”

"Study abroad programs in Israel are not open to all U.S. students," said Cynthia Franklin, another member of USACBI's organizing collective and a professor of English at the University of Hawaii. "Israel can and does deny entry to diasporic Palestinian students, as well as to non-Palestinian Muslims and Arabs. Palestinian students are not free to travel in or out of the country to pursue their educational goals."

"Israel's antiboycott laws also mean that they can bar entry to any students who are known for their work supporting the BDS movement," Franklin said.

"As a supporter of the academic boycott, like John Cheney-Lippold, I would decline to write a letter of recommendation for a student applying to a study abroad program in Israel. I could not write such a letter in good conscience, as that would mean that I would be supporting and legitimating an academic program that is discriminatory. This student would, of course, be free to ask for a letter of recommendation from another faculty member."

Cheney-Lippold said he was uncomfortable with the focus being on him and the decision of whether or not to write a recommendation rather than the conditions he sought to draw attention to. "I never wanted to be the story," he said. "I want to be able to use the tactic of a boycott to highlight the apartheid system, to highlight the discrimination that’s happening, to put the spotlight not on a single professor at the University of Michigan, but why might a professor have done this.”

He said he has not heard from the student since he sent the email Sept. 5.

Editorial Tags: Academic freedomIsraelIs this diversity newsletter?: Newsletter Order: 0Disable left side advertisement?: Is this Career Advice newsletter?: Magazine treatment: Trending: Trending text: Politics and RecommendationsTrending order: 1College: University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

Pages